Private Vs. Public Cloud Security: 10 Key Differences

With cloud adoption skyrocketing around the world, more and more organizations are choosing between private and public cloud deployments for mission-critical workloads. However, balancing cost, scalability, and risk tolerance is necessary in deciding on a model, but security remains a central concern. In 2023, 82% of data breaches were due to cloud-stored data, showing the increasing reliance on remote infrastructure for sensitive data. In this article, we unravel private vs public cloud security and explore the differences that help businesses choose the right cloud approach.

We will first define private cloud security and explain how it differs from on-prem and other hosting models. We’ll then discuss public cloud security fundamentals, such as what’s different and what’s the same, and the unique advantages and vulnerabilities that come with the public cloud.

Next, we will further elaborate on the private vs public cloud cost, compliance and technical complexity differences and finish with a side-by-side table of key differences. Last but not least, you’ll see how SentinelOne’s Singularity Cloud Security Platform offers robust AI-driven defense to security in public cloud vs private cloud.

What is Private Cloud Security?

A private cloud is an architecture that is dedicated exclusively to one organization. In turn, such clouds tend to run on on-premise data centers or specialized third-party facilities, which provide enterprises with control over resources and governance. Although “private” means greater data isolation, the challenges of securing data are still daunting: network segmentation, encryption at rest, hypervisor patching, and so on.

Moreover, recent surveys indicate that nearly 98% of businesses have had at least one vendor relationship compromised in the past two years, showing that third-party risk is not exclusive to public companies. Private clouds are successful only when there is complete endpoint monitoring, robust identity management, and well-structured DDoS protection. In the private cloud DFIR process, logs are collected from dedicated hypervisors, specialized network devices, and self-hosted VMs, which means that the threat surface is controlled with granularity.

Key Features of Private Cloud Security

Private clouds are commonly used by large enterprises or heavily regulated industries that must abide by strict compliance requirements and data sovereignty demands. Security remains crucial: Simply, any misconfiguration or unpatched hypervisor can kill the perceived exclusivity advantage.

Below are 5 critical features that set apart private vs public cloud computing security in dedicated environments, which organizations rely on to keep data safe and keep operations up and running.

1. Dedicated Infrastructure Controls: Private clouds generally execute on hardware that is owned by the organization or leased in a dedicated fashion. As a result of this isolation, we often have more direct control over how resources are allocated, the patch cycle, and the hypervisor configuration. Strict segmentation helps reduce noisy neighbors or cross-tenant vulnerabilities. But it also increases the load on the internal team to keep the systems up-to-date and enforce zero trust networking.
2. Customized Network Segmentation: Private environments are not shared with external tenants on physical infrastructure, which leaves administrators free to implement finely-tuned VLANs or micro-segmentation strategies. These designs restrict lateral movement and possible infiltration routes. It also enables more rigid perimeter controls and sensor placements to detect advanced intrusions. This, however, can still expose the entire environment with improper segmentation or a single misconfiguration.
3. Enhanced Data Sovereignty & Compliance: Private clouds are often an enterprise’s choice for compliance mandates such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, or GDPR that dictate explicit control over data location. Compliance posture is strengthened with custom encryption policies and localized data centers. For heavily regulated sectors, the private vs public cloud difference is about the cost of compliance and operational overhead. Critical records have a verifiable chain of custody, thanks to proper encryption, as well as robust audit logs.
4. On-Premises Security Tool Integration: Private clouds neatly fit into the existing on-prem security toolset, from SIEM solutions to physical access controls. This synergy unifies monitoring dashboards and running consistent intrusion detection rules throughout the environment. It can automate management, but it needs to be tightly orchestrated to prevent coverage gaps, such as legacy systems that don’t adapt well to dynamic virtual machines. Still, the proper calibration of each sensor or tool is vital in order to avoid blind spots.
5. In-Depth Network Visibility: When you run a private cloud, the administrator often has full access to the underlying network layers, switch configurations, firewall appliances, logs, and so on. From this vantage point, teams get deeper forensics data, capable of capturing traffic at multiple points for deeper analysis. Such details lead to more robust threat hunting and zero-day detection. However, it also requires staff with the training and skill to quickly spot anomalies in these sweeping data streams.

What is Public Cloud Security?

On the other hand, public clouds such as AWS, Azure, or GCP run multiple tenants on top of virtualized layers while sharing underlying hardware resources. Cloud usage is accelerating, and the number of known cloud vulnerabilities has exploded from about 1,700 in 2019 to around 3,900 in 2023, demonstrating that risks are changing. In a public cloud environment, security is primarily based on a shared responsibility model, where the provider (infrastructure security) and customer (workload and data protection) share tasks.

For example, hypervisors and physical data centers are secured by AWS, and clients take on OS patching and application layer defenses. Public cloud vendors spend millions on security R&D, but open S3 buckets and unencrypted volumes remain major pitfalls. The difficulty of security in public cloud vs private cloud is due to multi-tenant resource sharing and reliance on provider-supplied abstraction layers.

Key Features of Public Cloud Security

Elasticity, global coverage, and flexible on-demand scaling are where public clouds shine. Of course, this convenience comes with its own set of security intricacies: shared tenancy, ephemeral containers, or complex identity management.

Below, we outline five features that differentiate public vs private cloud computing in the public space that show how organizations can ensure data security and maintain availability in a multi-tenant environment.

1. Shared Responsibility Model: The provider handles underlying hardware and virtualization layers, while the customer handles operating systems, apps, and data. Built-in patches for host OS or hypervisor, but offloads work such as database encryption or IAM to the tenant. These boundaries matter, if you don’t secure the “customer” side, you’ll get misconfigured data. Clarity of roles helps eliminate duplication but is very reliant on the customer side having full oversight.
2. Native Security Services: Public cloud leaders, such as AWS, Azure, and GCP, offer a host of built-in security tools, like AWS WAF, Azure Defender, and GCP Security Command Center. With these services, you get advanced threat detection or DDoS mitigation without huge overhead, and they integrate well with existing logs. They can be selected for use by users to manage identities, store secrets, and encrypt things. This is a major private vs public cloud difference: In public clouds, they can be easily extended with vendor-managed security modules, but in private setups, they require custom solutions.
3. Automated Scalability & Patching: If you choose managed solutions, like Fargate or Azure Functions, then public cloud services take care of things like OS patching or container updates for you. Workload demands are automatically distributed across regions, and the platform scales resources. This flexibility also makes ephemeral VMs or containers pop up and disappear, making continuous tracking from a DFIR perspective difficult. Organizations that use these managed offerings don’t need to worry about overhead, but they need to watch ephemeral logs and ephemeral compute states.
4. Broad Ecosystem Integrations: Third-party solutions integrate with ease through APIs or provisioning templates, and public clouds have robust marketplaces and partner networks. With minimal friction, users can quickly adopt advanced security tools for EDR, vulnerability scanning, or SIEM. This leads to a dynamic security approach in the public cloud vs private cloud so that new solutions can be deployed or retired quickly. One issue is integration complexity if a number of third-party tools overlap and/or cause conflicting alerts.
5. Global Footprint & Geo-Redundancy: AWS, Azure, or GCP span regions worldwide and provide customers with the ability to deploy across multiple data centers for redundancy. A multi-region approach helps to mitigate localized outages or natural disasters but makes compliance more difficult when data needs to stay in certain jurisdictions. It’s easier to replicate or load balance across continents in public clouds rather than private hardware. However, from a security perspective, cross-region replication can be a source of exfiltration risk if not cautiously controlled.

Difference Between Public and Private Cloud Security

Private and public clouds share a common reliance on virtualization but have different architectures, which affects how security design is done. Private clouds enable direct hardware control and solid segmentation, which is good for companies with very high compliance or performance needs.

While public clouds enable rapid scalability due to their provider abstractions, they also rely on shared infrastructure, which necessitates tenant protection. Below, we break down private vs public cloud security on eight key facets, from cost and scalability to compliance and more, to see how each environment meets different business needs.

1. Definition: Private clouds are in on-prem data centers or dedicated hosting and only serve one organization. Major providers run public clouds, where resources are multi-tenant and available over the internet via a pay-as-you-go basis. In essence, private vs public cloud difference emerges at the ownership and access level i.e., public clouds share resources between multiple clients, while private clouds are built as single tenants. The security approaches differ accordingly: Private setups need end-to-end coverage of the enterprise, while public clouds choose to delegate the underlying infrastructure security to the vendor. Each model requires a careful assessment of the data types, compliance, and cost structure.
2. Advantages: Private cloud security would boast direct control and customization, which is perfect for industries that require specialized compliance or performance. While public clouds shine in terms of rapid scalability and global reach, the time to spin up new workloads is reduced. This forms the crux of private vs public cloud computing: For sensitive databases, private clouds might hold a steady, predictable performance, but public options scale at a fraction of the capital expense. From a security perspective, public providers spend heavily on advanced security technologies, but with multi-tenant complexities. However, private infrastructures can tailor encryption, hypervisors, and network segmentation to fit with organizational standards.
3. Challenges: The main hurdles of private DFIR setups are the overhead of securing and maintaining hardware and the latest hypervisor patches. At the same time, security in public cloud vs private cloud also means public tenants are dealing with misconfigurations such as open storage or incomplete IAM. Ephemeral evidence complicates forensic investigation with ephemeral or container-based workloads. With this ephemeral nuance and shared responsibility model, it can be confusing who should be addressing a given vulnerability. Whichever model is selected, the rapidly growing volume of cloud vulnerabilities worldwide undermines the need for strong processes and staff training.
4. Best Practices: Best practices in private environments are focused on micro-segmentation, thorough patch cycles, and zero trust frameworks that assume internal traffic cannot be fully trusted. Furthermore, capacity planning must always be current so that expansion doesn’t come at the cost of compromised security or resource strain. When running in the public cloud, providers deliver native security tools, enforce robust IAM, and monitor logs for suspicious API calls. This shared responsibility model also allows enterprises to be in charge of application security and data encryption. In both cases, a clear role is designated, incident runbooks are drafted, and advanced solutions (such as AI-based EDR) are adopted to reduce the impact of private vs public cloud security threats.
5. Cost: Private clouds are based on upfront capital expenditures for the servers, storage arrays, networking gear, and ongoing maintenance and power costs. Organizations have more direct control over time but have to deal with hardware refresh cycles. Public clouds work on a pay-as-you-use model, shifting costs to operational expenses that can grow and shrink. But if you don’t monitor usage in a public environment, compute or bandwidth consumption can spike, and you can pay a shocking monthly bill. There’s also security overhead, with private setups typically requiring specialized staff and tooling, while public clouds often include baseline protection services, which can reduce some security costs.
6. Scalability: The private cloud can be customized to highly specialized workloads, but there are hardware capacity limits, and expanding clusters means buying more servers. This approach guarantees a consistent performance. However, it requires extremely careful capacity planning, especially for seasonal or unpredictable surges. Public clouds excel at near-instant flexibility as they can ramp up or down on demand (auto-scaling groups or serverless frameworks). From a public vs private cloud difference perspective, scaling is easier in public clouds, but if usage is not managed well, the cost may explode. On the other hand, private expansions demand hardware shipping lead times, installation, and testing, which can slow down agility.
7. Data Privacy and Compliance: Private clouds are often preferred by organizations working with sensitive PII or regulated data because they want to control things directly and keep the data within physically secured facilities. This promotes compliance with HIPAA, PCI DSS, or GDPR, requiring strict data localization. However, multi-tenancy adds complexities such as shared resources and data co-location, which can be a challenge for public clouds to support compliance frameworks such as FedRAMP and HITRUST. The question of security in public cloud vs private cloud becomes a compliance puzzle: If you store your data in, say, multi-region AWS buckets, can your data pass local and international laws? Consequently, providers who do not meet specialized standards or region-based restrictions can be less flexible in the compliance overhead they impose in multi-tenant contexts.
8. Use Cases: In highly regulated sectors (banking, government, healthcare), mission-critical workloads are likely to be hosted in private clouds to maintain granular control, stable performance, and compliance. Public clouds are meanwhile appropriate for dev/test environments, global expansions, or data analytics with ephemeral scale. Hybrid solutions combine both in which new microservices go to the public cloud, but sensitive data or legacy apps stay on private infrastructure. Different environments have different security practices, from micro-segmentation in private data centers to advanced ephemeral scanning in the public cloud. Aligning these use cases allows businesses to find the perfect mix of cost, compliance, and resilience.
9. Disaster Recovery & Geographic Redundancy: Internal DR setups are possible with private clouds by replicating data to secondary on-prem sites, but it takes extra hardware and duplicate resources. The advantage is the ability to control RPO/RTO targets exactly, but that is expensive. Built-in DR capabilities across multiple availability zones or regions are available at simpler pay-per-use rates for scaling backups or failovers and are the perfect fit for public clouds. However, cross-region replication could be complicated by local data residency laws. The private vs public cloud difference often comes down to balancing privacy constraints with multi-region backups where businesses must decide if data can be stored or recovered in a public provider’s remote location.

Private Vs Public Cloud: 10 Key Differences

Here is a small chart that summarizes major differences in private vs public cloud security such as ownership to compliance. Although each approach can fulfill the needs of the enterprise, it is important for organizations to understand these fundamental differences to build a robust, context-aware security strategy.

Instead, a quick glance can help you decide or validate assumptions about cost, data control, and complexity of integration.

The table above explains the differences between private vs public cloud computing based on ownership, scalability, cost, compliance, and more. On the other hand, private clouds give organizations greater control and consistency at the cost of heavy maintenance overhead and capital costs. While public clouds make resource scaling and hardware refreshes easy, they also offload security tasks into a shared responsibility model, which means that security configuration must be closely watched.

On the compliance side, private clouds are good at keeping data local for strict regulation, while public clouds provide advanced services that might make day-to-day management easier. Ultimately, whether a private or public cloud is chosen depends on your own performance, compliance, cost, and operational complexity needs.

SentinelOne Singularity™ for Cloud Security

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is an AI-powered CNAPP solution that unifies threat detection and automatic response to solve private vs public cloud security challenges. It enforces consistent security from build time to runtime, leveraging real-time telemetry across endpoints, servers, containers, and more. With support for multiple environments, from on-prem private clouds to public infrastructures or hybrid setups, it provides threat visibility and minimizes misconfiguration risk.

In practice, Singularity Cloud Security combines advanced analytics, layered detection and automated responses to defeat vulnerabilities, container threats, and misconfigurations. It’s a cross-platform approach, pulling data from all corners of your infrastructure to make sure no hidden vulnerabilities or ephemeral containers fall through the cracks. SentinelOne unifies security in the public cloud vs private cloud deployments through consistent, enterprise-grade defense by focusing on AI-based anomaly detection and scalable remediation workflows. You can detect over 750+ different types of secrets, public and private cloud repos, and prevent cloud credentials leakages.

It provides various features such as: Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP), Kubernetes Security Posture Management (KSPM), Cloud Detection & Response (CDR), External Attack and Surface Management (EASM), AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM), IaC Scanning, SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM), and more.

Book a free live demo.

Conclusion

Today’s enterprises rely on the cloud for agility, but each cloud type, private or public, requires a different set of security considerations. Teams can then compare private vs public cloud security side by side and see how ownership, scaling, compliance, cost, and performance combine to form risk. Control and customization are strengths of private clouds, but at the cost of operation overhead, while public clouds offer easy scalability at the cost of configuration vigilance and shared responsibility.

AI-based detection, robust identity management, and well-defined runbooks are always ideal choices, regardless of your model. SentinelOne Singularity Platform allows you to monitor and orchestrate a rapid threat response across all cloud footprints: private, public, or hybrid. Are you ready to secure your cloud journey? Begin with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security with AI-driven detection, automated remediation, and unmatched visibility.

FAQs

1. What is the main Difference between Private and Public Cloud Computing?

Private clouds are dedicated environments, on-prem or hosted data centers, with exclusive hardware and network control. In the case of public clouds such as AWS or Azure, infrastructure is shared among many tenants. Private clouds allow for more customization in terms of security but tend to have higher capex and operational overhead. Flexibility and cost efficiency are public cloud strengths, but they need robust configuration and trust in the provider’s security layers.

2. Which is more Secure: Private or Public Cloud?

Correct implementation of the model is what security depends on, not the model itself. Direct hardware and hypervisor control is possible in private setups, but it takes a large amount of in-house expertise. Although public clouds spend a lot of money on advanced defenses, multi-tenancy can introduce shared risks. In the end, strong governance, encryption, and continuous monitoring are key to security in public cloud vs private cloud success.

3. How does the Shared Responsibility Model apply to Public Clouds?

In the public cloud, the providers protect the underlying infrastructure, i.e., physical data centers, hypervisors, and core networking. Tenants take care of OS-level patches, app security, and data encryption. This division is crucial for private vs public cloud differences: In public clouds, however, the vendor will take care of a part of the stack but in private clouds, the owners will take care of the entire stack. If you don’t live up to your side of the shared model, your applications will be exposed.

4. Can Organizations Combine Private and Public Clouds?

Hybrid or multi-cloud strategies mean that enterprises can store sensitive workloads in a private environment and then outsource less sensitive apps to public providers. This approach combines private and consistent performance or compliance with public elastic resources. Security teams use this to bridge both and build consistent policies across different layers. As a result, the architecture is flexible for performance, cost, and compliance.

5. What are Common Security Risks in Public Clouds?

The number one error is misconfigurations, such as open storage buckets or incorrect IAM policies. Ephemeral workloads, for example, are exploited by attackers, and stolen credentials are used to bypass tenant defenses. The multi-tenant architecture requires strict isolation to prevent cross-tenant compromise. These challenges emphasize the importance of strong vendor services and security frameworks in public cloud deployments.

6. Is Private Cloud Security more Expensive than Public Cloud Security?

Often, yes. Private setups demand capital spending on hardware, data centers, power, and a team of dedicated security workers. Pay-as-you-go is the norm for public clouds, but when you have large-scale usage, costs go up. The private vs public cloud difference is a significant one when it comes to cost calculations. Private clouds may be cheaper in the long-term if you know your capacity utilization, but public clouds are great at scaling without large upfront spend. At the end of the day, the decision depends on business workloads and compliance requirements.

7. Which Cloud Model offers better Disaster Recovery Options?

The failover process is usually streamlined with built-in DR solutions and multi-region replication in public clouds.  On the other hand, private clouds can replicate data to secondary on-prem sites or specialized DR centers, which requires a lot of hardware and maintenance. This is a prime private vs public cloud computing difference. However, while public vendors offer automated region-based redundancy, achieving private DR requires more effort. Actual DR success is determined by planning and runbook rehearsals in both cases.

8. What type of Cloud Security is best for Startups?

Public cloud is usually flexible offering usage-based billing, and easily accessible security features which are great for startups. Building a robust private cloud is expensive, generally requiring specialized staff and upfront investment. However, startups do need to follow best practices for security in public cloud vs private cloud (strong IAM, encryption, real-time logs, etc) in order to avoid common misconfigurations. The agility of the public cloud often trumps the granular control of the private for early-stage scaling.