What is Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)?

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) provides continuous testing to assess cybersecurity defenses against threats. Learn what BAS is, its benefits, challenges, and how to choose the right solution.
By SentinelOne November 18, 2024

Cyber threats are evolving rapidly, forcing organizations to rethink their cybersecurity defenses. Breach and Attack Simulation, or BAS in short, plays a strategic role in assessing an organization’s security posture on a proactive basis by simulating attacks in a real-world environment. BAS takes traditional methods of testing several steps further by making it continuous. According to the Identity Theft Resource Center, data breaches across the U.S. rose 78% in 2023 compared to 2022. That underlines the demand for BAS solutions as they illuminate the paths an attacker would take through your systems via open vulnerabilities, showing the way organizations can take corrective measures before it’s too late.

In this article, we will look into breach and attack simulation(BAS) in detail, what BAS is, the need for it, and the types of attacks it can simulate. We will also discuss how BAS works, the advantages of using it, the challenges, best practices to use it effectively, and some use cases. Additionally, we will talk about how to choose the right BAS platform and how SentinelOne can help organizations that want to implement BAS.

What is Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)?

Breach and attack simulation is a proactive cybersecurity testing approach that automates the process of simulating various cyberattacks to evaluate the organization’s defenses. BAS tools offer simulated real-world attacks, such as malware infiltrations and phishing campaigns, among other common attack vectors. The goal is continuous identification of vulnerabilities across endpoints, networks, and applications to keep organizations ahead of evolving cyber threats. In contrast, where traditional vulnerability assessment and scanning are discrete in nature, BAS provides continuous visibility and thus allows security teams to swiftly address weaknesses as they appear.

A report says 69% of enterprises migrate their most sensitive mission-critical data to the cloud, and effective security solutions, such as BAS, are witnessing significant demand. Since cloud migration comes with newer risks that businesses should manage proactively, BAS tools help mitigate these challenges with continuous and ongoing assessments of on-premise and cloud environments. This helps the organizations secure sensitive data and improve overall resilience.

Need for Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Breach and attack simulation is an integral part of the assessment and proactive protection a company needs against evolving threats. BAS security provides continuous insight into potential security flaws that ensure readiness against complex attacks.

Given this importance, here is why BAS is critical:

  1. Addressing Threat Complexity: Most cyber threats have evolved and can easily bypass traditional methods of detection using advanced and multi-layered techniques. BAS gives a business the ability to perform such complex attacks internally and allows the organization’s defenses to be prepared for these evolving threats. It replicates real-world adversarial techniques and thus is a proactive way to strengthen security measures.
  2. Proactively Identifying Security Gaps: Traditionally scheduled audits don’t offer visibility of vulnerabilities available between assessments. BAS lets organizations remediate these weaknesses in real-time and continuously view security gaps. This model moves along the fundamentally changing nature of traditional security auditing to focus on finding and mitigating vulnerabilities as quickly as possible.
  3. Incident Response Readiness Improvement: BAS allows an organization to exercise readiness in response teams through attack simulation. Attack simulations improve response plans, reduce response times, and ensure coherence in breach management. With BAS, these simulations help teams get ready to take immediate action that minimizes impact, hence offering a smooth incident response process.
  4. Regulatory Compliance and Audit Readiness: Most regulatory standards require sustained testing and validation of cybersecurity measures. BAS plays a critical role in the fulfillment of these requirements through ongoing assessments and audit trails. BAS aligns security practices to regulatory needs by catering effectively and informatively to continuous testing requirements.
  5. Cost-Effective Management of Vulnerabilities: BAS helps in proactive detection of risks and thereby saves from costly incidents. Early identification of weaknesses saves an organization from potential losses due to data breaches or ransomware attacks. Furthermore, BAS tools secure the potential weaknesses that may lead to high-stake incidents, preventing costly recovery efforts.

What Types of Attacks Can Be Simulated With BAS?

BAS solutions are designed to emulate various types of cyberattacks common in the threat landscape today. These capabilities enable testing the efficacy and resistance level of security controls to offer quick detection and mitigation of threats. The following are the main attack types that BAS tools can simulate:

  1. Phishing Attacks: Simulated phishing attacks test employees on their ability to recognize phishing attempts. Such simulations help organizations understand their level of vulnerability in the case of social engineering attacks and whether further training of the staff is required. Simulations test technology and human awareness and help organizations understand email security and phishing awareness gaps that need consideration.
  2. Ransomware Deployment: Carrying out ransomware attacks emulates an organization’s capability to detect, isolate, and respond to ransomware infection. Also included is checking whether the backups are accessible and safe from encryption. These scenarios check not only detection but also the capability of containing ransomware, thus assuring recovery processes that are sound and secure.
  3. Lateral Movement Tactics: This type of simulation tests the possibilities of an attacker moving laterally inside a network after initially gaining access. It identifies whether proper network segmentation and internal controls are in place to restrict an attacker’s movement. BAS tools, therefore, provide a view by simulating lateral movement tactics to determine whether barriers like segmentation or other means can stop an attacker from spreading.
  4. Data exfiltration techniques: In data exfiltration, simulation tests are helpful for testing DLP controls by imitating how attackers use various techniques or tools to extract sensitive data from an organization. Testing of DLP systems along with encryption protocols helps the organization understand how safe the sensitive data being processed is and how well it is being monitored.
  5. Man-in-the-Middle Attack: The simulation of MitM attacks checks the security of data transmission over the network. It ensures that good encryption along with secure communication protocols is provided. The simulation of a MitM attack helps to ensure that the encryption standards applied for secure communication across the network are strong enough.
  6. SQL Injection Attempts: BAS tools simulate SQL injection attempts, being among the most common and damaging forms of attack. They test resiliency in web applications and pinpoint weak points in both coding practices and database defenses. Moreover, SQL injection simulations with the use of BAS show possible areas in application security that could be used for data manipulation or unauthorized access.

How Breach and Attack Simulation Works?

Breach and attack simulation tools work in a systematic way, having multiple categorical stages involved in the process of efficiently scanning an organization’s security posture. For that, it is necessary to establish a continuous loop for assessment, feedback, and improvement.

Below, we have discussed in detail how BAS works:

  1. Defining Security Objectives: Security objectives must be clearly set, be it in testing phishing defenses, vulnerabilities at the endpoints, or checking network security. Establishing this scope makes realistic emulation strategic and takes into consideration the organizational priorities. Objectives are tailored, ensuring simulations align with specific organizational risks and provide targeted insights for improvement.
  2. Deploying BAS Tools: BAS tools are deployed in the targeted environment. Integration would be done with existing infrastructure, including SIEM systems, firewalls, and endpoint security solutions, to allow for the direct testing of these devices and to collect data without added complexity. Their facility of integration allows for working actively with currently installed security tools for better defense with no disruptions.
  3. Simulating Attack Scenarios: Predefined attack scenarios are executed, simulating the tactics, techniques, and procedures that would generally be performed by threat actors. These range from phishing attacks to malware deployment and attempts at network penetration. Customizable attack scenarios allow determination as to how defenses can prevent a wide range of advanced threat vectors.
  4. Security Response Analysis: BAS tools running in a simulation log how security controls react to these events, such as speed of detection, robustness of defense mechanisms, and vulnerabilities that can serve as an attack vector. Monitoring responses during the simulation identifies areas worthy of refinement to ensure readiness in real-time.
  5. Report Generation: After the simulations on the various vulnerabilities found defenses that worked, actionable recommendations for improvements are generated in detailed reports. Detailed reporting slices these vulnerabilities down to the granular level and provides actionable insights that help reinforce the layers of security.
  6. Improvement Cycle: This last stage reveals the application of reports generated for improving security. Organizations modify their defenses in line with those findings, and new simulations are executed in order to measure the effectiveness of this change. Consequently, this process specifies continuous enhancement of the security based on findings from repeated and adaptive simulations.

Benefits of Breach and Attack Simulation

Breach and attack simulation has immense benefits, making it worth implementation to improve the cybersecurity framework of any organization.

A few key benefits of implementing BAS solutions are discussed here:

  1. Proactive Identification of Vulnerabilities: BAS provides continuous visibility of the vulnerabilities present in an organization’s environment. If a business can identify vulnerabilities before those can be utilized by the attackers, that would add tremendous value to security posture. BAS ensures that the vulnerabilities are located and mitigated before they can be targeted by attackers.
  2. Improved Security Posture: The continuous testing and adjustments provide an improved security posture. BAS helps in ensuring that, from endpoints to cloud environments, systems are resilient against different forms of cyber-attacks. Testing on a regular schedule ensures an organization’s security framework stays updated with evolving threats.
  3. Improved Incident Response Training: BAS lets security teams practice their responses to simulated incidents, perfecting the execution when the real-world attack happens. It also ensures better coordination and decisions under high pressure. BAS reinforces response capabilities, allowing teams to confidently and efficiently manage real incidents.
  4. Improved Regulatory Compliance: BAS helps achieve regulatory compliance requirements through continuous testing and validation of security controls. Compliance with standards such as PCI DSS, GDPR, and ISO 27001 becomes easier with BAS reports and assessments. BAS not only meets but exceeds compliance needs through mere continuous validation of security measures.
  5. Cost Savings on Cyber Insurance: Implementation of BAS tools facilitates chances of getting lower premiums on cyber insurance policies due to the proactive and consistent approach an organization adopts in security testing. This reduces operation costs in general. Furthermore, BAS reduces perceived risk with a robust security posture that may lower insurance costs.
  6. Clear Metrics for Security Effectiveness: BAS solutions provide clear metrics of the effectiveness of security controls. This is important data both for tracking by a security team and for executive reporting. BAS simulations give measurability to outcomes, enabling an organization to make further strategic refinements in pursuit of real data.

Challenges and Limitations of BAS

While beneficial, breach and attack simulation also has a number of challenges and limitations that an organization should be better equipped to handle. Understanding these will aid businesses in the proper handling of BAS implementations and efficient workflow:

  1. False Positives and Noise: BAS tools can also produce false positives and noises at times that can saturate the security team if not tuned appropriately. This requires great care in tuning the tools to separate meaningful insight from noise. Fine-tuning will be necessary for BAS tools to reduce alert fatigue and actionable results for security teams.
  2. Resource Requirements: Some resource requirements, such as skilled personnel are necessary to run the BAS effectively so that the results can be interpreted and appropriate security enhancements applied. Smaller organizations may find it hard to fulfill this resource requirement. BAS needs a long-term commitment of personnel and resources, which may be tough to manage by a smaller organization.
  3. Tool Complexity: Most BAS solutions are very complex to deploy and integrate. This may easily deter organizations with no dedicated cybersecurity teams, as running these systems effectively requires great amounts of configuration and knowledge. Most of the small-scale BAS setups are too elaborate, thus limiting adoption in smaller organizations. This calls for solutions that can balance functionality with ease of use.
  4. Operational Disruption: Poorly designed or poorly managed simulations have the potential to inadvertently disrupt normal operations. It is of the essence that BAS be carefully conducted to avoid scenarios that disrupt important business processes. As a result, this proper planning and scheduling of the tests of BAS ensure that core business processes are not disrupted.
  5. Keeping Simulations Up to Date: SMEs may find implementation too costly, considering the buying and maintenance costs entailed with BAS tools. This may hamper their predisposition toward BAS implementations in effect. Effective BAS requires an initial investment in terms of a balanced long-term return in the form of security benefits.
  6. Maintain the Simulator: Cyber threats operate at an extremely fast pace. Therefore, conscious efforts are required to keep the different BAS tools updated with emerging tactics, techniques, and procedures. Otherwise, simulations will become less effective. In fact, regular updates are necessary, lest the simulations test old problems and may fail to catch important ones.

Best Practices for Using BAS Effectively

To maximize the value of breach and attack simulation (BAS), follow these best practices. These steps ensure that simulations are both effective and aligned with the organization’s overarching security strategy, strengthening your security posture proactively.

  1. Integrate BAS with Existing Security Frameworks: The BAS tool should be fully integrated with other existing security components, such as SIEM systems. Such integration may reinforce data collection and even provide a better overview of security gaps. With an effectively integrated solution of BAS, the current security setup is bolstered and overall defense enhanced.
  2. Clearly Define Security Objectives: Before deploying BAS, clearly outline the objectives. Whether it be testing defenses, validation of network security, or assessment of employee resilience to phishing, clearly defined goals ensure that simulations are targeted for specific security challenges that will guide every step of the process.
  3. Customized Attack Scenarios: Not all attack scenarios that organizations test their preparedness against can always be standard, off-the-shelf scenarios. Tailoring simulations to emulate those particular threats pertinent to the industry assures that the insights gained are directly applicable in real life. Custom scenarios allow tailoring of simulations to a company’s risk profile for more relevant and actionable insights.
  4. Regular Updates and Maintenance: BAS tools and simulation scenarios should be kept up to date. Hackers continually create new attack methodologies, and the effectiveness of any BAS simulations depends on their ability to evolve as well. It keeps the BAS tools and their attack library updated against real-world threat landscapes through regular updates.
  5. Simulation Response Training for Teams: BAS is not limited to technology alone and can also be considered as a training tool. Simulations should be viewed by organizations as a means to an end, whereby they would take on the regular training and updating of their security teams through their insight into the latest threats and response techniques.
  6. Monitor Metrics and Adapt Accordingly: Follow through with modifications based on metrics, as metrics developed from a BAS provide necessary insight. Organizations should periodically review metrics and adapt defenses to maintain improvement and stay prepared for emerging threats. Metrics outline a path forward that drives decisions based on security defenses that become agile.

Key Breach and Attack Simulation Use Cases

Breach and attack simulation can be extended to different use cases in the organization to build up its cybersecurity in general. By leveraging BAS in these areas, organizations can proactively identify vulnerabilities and strengthen their security posture. Let’s look at some popular use cases:

  1. Validating Security Controls: BAS can be used to validate the effectiveness of the implemented security control. It assists an organization in identifying whether its defenses are good or bad and indicates where improvement is required. BAS verifies whether the security defenses are good enough against a set of cyber threats to provide any actual control effectiveness view.
  2. Employee Security Training: In addition to simulating phishing attacks, one of the most common types of attacks, BAS offers hands-on employee training in the identification and response to cyber threats, fortifying the organization’s human firewall. Employees are given hands-on experience in identifying and reacting to cyber threats that solidify the organization’s human firewall.
  3. Incident Response Validation: BAS lets an organization gauge how well incident response plans are executed by personnel in the case of simulated cyber-attacks. Such knowledge can then be put to good use to refine procedures and make response times tops in cases of real-world incidents. BAS will test the incident response process for effectiveness, ensuring response plans are valid and workable.
  4. Board-Level Reporting: The data derived from the use of BAS tools is easily translatable into metrics that executives and boards can understand. This is critical in helping them understand the cybersecurity posture of the organization and how effective those ongoing security initiatives are. Simplified metrics help the board members understand and support the organization’s security investments.
  5. Vulnerability Patching Validation: BAS can also be used to check if patches have been correctly applied and securely seal known vulnerabilities. It ensures the effort of patching is regarded as successful, adding an extra layer of verification. BAS ensures patches close vulnerabilities, enhancing protection against exploits.
  6. Supply Chain Security Testing: Organizations are becoming more interconnected, and thus, supply chain attacks are more likely to occur. BAS can simulate attacks on third-party connectivity to assess how well suppliers and vendors are secured, providing assurance that supply chain risks have been handled. It helps in checking how secure third-party connectivity is against supply chain attacks.

How to Choose the Right Breach and Attack Simulation Platform?

Having an ideal breach and attack simulation solution is key to the success of your cybersecurity strategy. With the number of BAS platforms continuing to swell, the guiding factors to consider in selecting one include:

  1. Ease of Integration: The BAS platform should easily integrate with the cybersecurity infrastructure you have in place, including existing SIEM, SOAR, and endpoint security tools. This maximizes the utilization of the platform. One of the highest values of a properly integrated BAS platform is how well it fits into the current security infrastructure, ensuring maximum effectiveness.
  2. Scalability: Find the BAS solution that will grow with your organization. As your operations grow, so should the BAS platform, which includes additional endpoints, new systems, and more users, all handled flawlessly without reducing the system’s effectiveness. The solution should grow with the company, maintaining effectiveness across larger systems and growing user bases.
  3. Automation Features: The automation capability of attack simulations is a major factor in selecting a BAS platform. Automation reduces the workload on security teams by handling repeatable tasks and enables more strategic activities. Simulations via automation save resources that might be utilized by security teams for strategic initiatives.
  4. Vendor Support and Expertise: Quality support from the vendor includes a well-established network of support, regular updates on threat simulation, and immediate availability of skilled resources for insight and troubleshooting. Quality vendor support also ensures that the BAS platforms are updated and adapted to the latest threats.
  5. Customization Capabilities: Organizations have different security needs due to industry or infrastructure. A good BAS platform gives you the ability to customize attack simulations so they relate closely to actual risks your organization deals with. Flexible BAS solutions allow adjustment to fit an organization’s unique needs, adding to relevance and applicability.
  6. Intuitive Dashboard: With an easy-to-use, intuitive dashboard, it’s easier for security teams to interpret results quickly and take necessary actions without wasting time on complicated interfaces. An intuitive interface means security teams can quickly assess and respond to insights without added complexity.

How SentinelOne Can Help?

Breach and Attack Simulation is an important development in cybersecurity. It allows organizations to test their defenses against proactive, real-world threats. Through a new partnership with SafeBreach, SentinelOne has added more offerings to its product set, enriching its endpoint protection capabilities.

This deployment allows organizations to test thousands of attack techniques in a safe manner to verify that security measures are implemented and correctly configured against likely intrusions. The integration of SentinelOne Singularity™ Platform and the suite of tools from SafeBreach allows security teams to automate testing and validation. Continuous execution of simulated attacks that use the tactics cybercriminals use allows important insight into one’s own posture for cybersecurity. Rather than an assessment, the method provides a real-time evaluation of how well the existing protections and pre-existing protections can function in increasingly hardened states.

There are plenty of ways organizations can leverage BAS features using SentinelOne. Its ongoing validation of security controls across endpoints, cloud services, and networks enables teams to find and resolve weaknesses and misconfigurations before an adversary can exploit them. Detailed reports from these simulations highlight vulnerabilities and, thus, help prioritize remediation efforts by risk.

SentinelOne simplifies the work of security teams by correlating the results from the simulation with the real-time endpoint data. Therefore, teams can envision their level of exposure through simple dashboards aligned to frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK. It not only helps teams respond immediately but also offers a good basis for building long-term strategic planning related to cybersecurity investment.

It is a strong training tool for security personnel as it simulates realistic attack scenarios; it builds up teamwork to respond effectively when these incidents happen, thus creating resilience within an organization. SentinelOne’s unique Offensive Security Engine™ with Verified Exploit Paths™ is also valuable in conducting breach and attack simulations.

The present landscape of emerging threats warrants an effective BAS strategy for organizations. By continuously validating their defenses with SentinelOne and SafeBreach, organizations can improve their cybersecurity posture while gaining confidence against emerging threats to critical assets.

Book a free live demo.

Conclusion

In the end, we understood the importance of breach and attack simulation (BAS) in modern cybersecurity and how it works as a continuous tool for testing security controls and looking for weaknesses that attackers can exploit. We also looked at why BAS is important in fortifying an organization’s defenses and how it enables incident response teams, ensures compliance, and decreases the cost to the organization for potential breaches. It is clear that BAS is a component that businesses must have as a part of their security strategy to build resilience against sophisticated cyber threats.

For businesses looking for a solution that offers them BAS capabilities, SentinelOne’s Singularity™ platform can be a go-to option. The platform gives businesses an edge over emerging threats with advanced BAS capabilities that enable security teams to anticipate, react, and eliminate security threats in real time. Singularity™ achieves security robustness through automated testing and comprehensive threat simulation across all environments. If you want to learn how SentinelOne can strengthen your organization’s defenses, why not schedule a consultation or demo today?

FAQs

1. What is an attack simulation?

An attack simulation also known as Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) is an automated type of security testing simulating real-world cyber threats against an organization’s defenses in order to test security controls or identify vulnerabilities.

2. How will BAS improve threat detection and response?

A BAS improves security through ongoing checking of security controls, which immediately feeds back to teams’ areas of weakness and helps prioritize remediation activities around real vulnerabilities. Such an automated process can quickly identify and address the possible threats.

3. What is the difference between a BAS platform and traditional penetration testing?

Unlike ordinary penetration testing, which is performed in cycles and relies on human judgment, BAS offers ongoing, automated testing that can execute thousands of attack scenarios without affecting business operations. It does much more frequent and broader coverage at a lesser manual effort.

4. What are the major benefits that a breach and attack simulation solution can offer?

This includes continuous security validation, reduced manual testing effort, coverage of all attack scenarios, actionable remediation guidance, and improved compliance reporting. Consistent, measurable outcomes from BAS help track an organization’s security posture over time.

5. How does BAS support attack surface management?

A BAS scans continuously for open assets, finds misconfigured services, and verifies security controls over the entire infrastructure. It will provide a continually updated view of an organization’s security posture and weaknesses.

6. What are some things to look for in a BAS tool when the business needs one?

Business analysis of attack scenarios appropriately covered, integrative capabilities in other security tools available, reporting features, ease of use, pricing model, and vendor support should be done. The business needs to identify whether the tool meets its industry-specific requirements and security framework compliance needs.

Experience the World’s Most Advanced Cybersecurity Platform

See how our intelligent, autonomous cybersecurity platform harnesses the power of data and AI to protect your organization now and into the future.