Organizations today grapple with a different set of challenges while securing their digital landscape, given the increased frequency and sophistication of cyber threats. As a matter of fact, global IT security spending surpassed USD 219 billion in 2023 and is estimated to cross a value of USD 300 billion by 2026. These statistics highlight the rising need to strengthen cybersecurity defenses across the world. Despite the considerable investment that most organizations have made, many breaches, critical security gaps, and an absence of proactive risk management keep organizations at risk.
As a result, achieving a strong security posture becomes a viable option for businesses that can minimize the impact of cyber threats and assure resilience in an increasingly evolving digital environment. This article will discuss risk posture meaning in detail, covering why it is important, and how businesses can measure and enhance it. We’ll also be comparing risk posture to other concepts, such as risk appetite, and diving deep into practical ways of making an assessment of risk levels within an organization. This guide will further discuss the differences between risk posture and information security posture and provide risk posture examples in practice.
What is Risk Posture and Why it Matters?
Risk posture is the general measure of an organization’s total risk exposure, meaning how much risk it currently is exposed to and how effectively it is managing that risk. It is a foundational aspect of a cybersecurity strategy that is used to inform decision-making and help determine where additional controls are needed to mitigate potential threats. Proper resource allocation, adherence to regulations, and preventing unanticipated data breaches in organizations work well with a defined risk posture. As per research, 90 percent of the organizations revealed an upgrade to centralized risk management, which was 85 percent in 2021. Among respondents, 54% reported that they use centralized risk management, which comparatively declined by 6% from 2021. These numbers reflect a growing trend toward more centralized approaches, which can dramatically help improve risk posture by providing constant oversight and reducing risks across all business functions.
Risk Posture vs Security Posture
Businesses need to understand the difference between a risk posture and a security posture to enhance their position in cybersecurity. A risk posture shows the management of risks, and security posture refers to defenses in place. Both are vital components for security, and that’s why we will discuss each in detail with the help of the table below:
Dimension | Risk Posture | Security Posture |
Definition | Overall approach to risk handling and management. | Strength of existing security measures and controls. |
Emphasis | Identification and control of risk exposure levels. | Implementing protective technologies and practices. |
Components | Includes risk appetite, management, and mitigation. | Policies, technical defenses, and employee training. |
Assessment Frequency | Most frequently during crises or changes of scale. | Continuous monitoring and assessment. |
Range | Manage identified existing and potential risks. | Deals with defenses and protective measures. |
Objective | Maintain an acceptable degree of risk. | Ensuring a safe environment from cyber attacks. |
Examples | Calculating probable monetary loss due to a cyber attack. | Configuration of firewalls, endpoint protection, etc. |
Risk posture refers to an organization’s exposure to cybersecurity risks, and how well those risks are being managed. It considers the current as well as future risks it carries along with steps taken by an organization to manage the same efficiently. A good risk posture prepares an organization for a position that reduces threat risk while exposing its risk level in tune with the higher business objectives. On the other hand, a security posture refers to the actual security controls, measures, and protocols implemented to protect the organization against threats. It includes preventive and detective measures such as firewalls, encryption, employee training, and access controls. This reflects how prepared an organization is to prevent, detect, and respond to security threats.
Whereas risk posture is more of an understanding and management of risks in a strategic manner, security posture is essentially the implementation of practical steps toward the protection of systems. Both are part of the overall company cybersecurity strategy and have to be balanced for maximum risk management. A good risk posture means that an organization knows what its system vulnerabilities are, is accurately aware of its threat landscape, and is making informed decisions in the acceptance or mitigation of the risks. In contrast, a strong security posture provides effective defenses against threats. This balancing of risk exposure with effective security controls is important in making an organization resilient enough and not only aware of the risks it faces but also equipped with the tools and strategies to manage and defend them effectively.
Risk Appetite vs Risk Posture
Risk appetite and risk posture are two related yet different concepts under the scope of cybersecurity. Risk appetite refers to the extent to which an organization accepts risk, while risk posture is the current risk that is being managed. These two concepts together offer strategic insight into risk tolerance and control. Proper alignment will ensure informed and balanced risk decisions.
Let’s understand both of these terms in brief:
Aspects | Risk Posture | Risk Appetite |
Definition | Present stand on risk management. | Amount of risk the organization is willing to undertake. |
Role | Informs overall security measures on exposure. | Guides decision-making within the framework of acceptable risks. |
Components | Involves risk management, assessment, and mitigation. | Defined by business objectives and tolerance levels. |
Scope | Reactive and proactive risk management. | Proactive, determining how much risk is allowable. |
Readability | Can be altered following assessment or incident. | Defined beforehand, reviewed annually. |
Implementation | Uses real-time metrics in directing security action. | Integrated into policy-making and strategy. |
Example | After an incident, security measures are changed. | Deciding to accept certain risks in exchange for growth opportunities. |
As we read before, both risk appetite and risk posture are two related but distinct concepts in the field of risk management. Risk appetite refers to the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to take in order to reach its business goals. It is a proactive concept founded by the company and serves as a strategic guidance framework. For example, a technology start-up company may be willing to take more risky alternatives by willing to invest more in new, experimental technologies even though this increases its risk. Risk posture is the level of risk exposure that currently an organization is managing. Here, it considers controls and mitigation measures and their effectiveness in managing the existing risks. Risk posture is dynamic and constantly changes with new emerging threats or as controls are being improved or degraded. Understanding the relationship between risk posture and risk appetite is also crucial for effective risk management.
A clear risk appetite serves as a benchmark for the organization to measure its risk posture. That is, whether its current state of risk lies within acceptable boundaries or if action needs to be taken to mitigate such risks. For instance, if an organization’s risk appetite states that only low-risk exposure is acceptable, but the risk posture shows that there are elevated risks in specific areas, then it automatically considers options to respond to those risks. We can say that the risk appetite drives the strategic decisions and boundaries, while the risk posture reflects how well the organization is keeping to those boundaries. The two concepts, when aligned, enable informed decisions, which means a business will know not only at what level it is prepared to accept risk but also whether it is effective at controlling risks in practice or not.
What are Risk Posture Levels?
The risk posture levels might be used to categorize the exposure of an organization to risk and its preparedness to manage it. Generally, these levels might serve to understand the overall resilience and vulnerability of a business toward potential threats. Here are different risk posture levels for your consideration:
- Low-Risk Posture: An organization identifies, manages, and minimizes most of its potential risks by adopting a low-risk posture. Companies with strong compliance programs and proactive monitoring that are comprehensive in their security measures fall into this category. It shows a higher resilience against cyber threats with almost negligible vulnerabilities to exploit.
- Moderate Risk Posture: An intermediate risk posture means the organization has identified several significant risks but cannot mitigate all of them. The business would have security measures in most areas, yet it does not have absolute protection in every aspect. Firms under this category could be very well defended in some aspects but vulnerable to newer threats or more evolved threats.
- Elevated Risk Posture: In an elevated-risk posture, the organization has identified various risks against which attacks may be initiated, though mitigation efforts have been in progress. There is a potential that the company is enhancing security or undertaking compliance work. This category indicates that the organization is required to strengthen mitigation for quick exposure reduction.
- High-Risk Posture: This risk posture level means that the organization is open to a number of unmanaged risks, and it does not have enough security controls to handle such threats. Companies at this level are likely to face a high risk of security breaches, financial loss, and reputational damage if risks are not mitigated. A high-risk posture requires immediate action to shore up defenses.
- Critical Risk Posture: With a critical-risk posture, the organization is critically exposed with minimal amounts of protection. Organizations with legacy systems, poor or nonexistent compliance practices, and a high risk of breach fall into this category. Immediate action is required to prevent great damage, and a thorough assessment is needed to get the risk posture down to safer levels.
Key Components of a Strong Risk Posture
A strong risk posture consists of several components that together ensure that an organization’s level of risk exposure is manageable or not. Each component ensures that the organization is prepared to identify, analyze, and mitigate potential threats. In this section, we will discuss key elements of a strong risk posture:
- Risk Identification and Analysis: The first step in a proper risk posture is to know the threats that pose data breaches, system outages, or physical disruptions in business. This would provide focused analytics and prioritization of mitigations to ensure resources take care of the most important vulnerabilities first. Reassessing risk on a regular basis becomes fundamental in adapting to new and/or evolving threats impinging on business continuity.
- Risk Mitigation Strategies: These strategies aim to reduce the impact of actualized threats by mitigating potential threats. This can be achieved by establishing stronger security measures, planning and developing incident response plans, or adopting more stringent compliance measures. The aim is to take proactive steps in minimizing the likelihood or severity of an incident.
- Compliance Management: To ensure risk management, it’s vital to be in compliance with regulatory standards like GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS. It means all security measures must follow the best practices so that trust between customers, stakeholders, and regulators is preserved. Non-compliance might invite financial penalties along with greater risk exposure.
- Ongoing Monitoring: Effective risk management requires the constant monitoring of systems, processes, and user behavior. It offers real-time insight into the organization’s risk environment. This allows easy detection and response to changes in a timely manner that keeps risks manageable and newly identified ones addressed as soon as they occur.
- Incident Response and Recovery Planning: A strong incident response and recovery plan is essential to mitigate the effects of a cyber incident. A well-prepared organization will reduce downtime, and data loss, and ensure business continuity in the event of a crisis. Testing and updating the incident response plan ensures that it is ready for all kinds of attack scenarios.
- Employee Awareness and Training: Employees play a crucial role in risk management. Through awareness of threats like phishing and common malware, the prevention of such attacks occurring because of human errors becomes possible. Thus, businesses should conduct regular employee education and continuous training.
How to Assess Risk Posture: A Step-by-Step Guide
This risk posture is structured and involves knowing the existing risk landscape within an organization, identifying vulnerabilities, and analyzing how the present measures will manage these risks. In this section, we will discuss a step-by-step guide for businesses to conduct effective risk posture assessment:
- Determine the Assessment Scope: The scope of the assessment will determine which systems, data, and assets will be reviewed. A clear scope ensures that all important areas receive focused attention and no crucial asset goes unnoticed. Setting boundaries helps in strategizing an effective assessment to identify and manage risks. For instance, a financial services firm would focus its assessment on high-risk areas like payment systems and customer databases in order to secure sensitive data effectively.
- List All Assets: Create a detailed accounting of both physical and digital company assets, including hardware, software, and databases. Segment these assets by their business and risk priorities. This enables effective prioritization, channeling more robust protective technologies toward top priorities while protecting less-priority information, such as sales collateral, against unwanted access. For example, an online store would want robust protection applied to its paying customers’ databases but keep marketing communications files less protected.
- Execute the Risk Analysis: Identify the vulnerability of each asset and what may happen if the threats are exploited. Determine the likelihood of threats to decide where most attention is needed. Risk analysis identifies areas with the greatest vulnerabilities and places appropriate security controls. An example is an e-commerce website that will focus on the security of the payment processing system since the risk is higher of exploitation for financial gain.
- Vulnerability Scanning and Penetration Testing: Use automated scanning for weaknesses in your systems, further penetrating to understand potential exploits. This approach not only identifies and explains vulnerabilities but also points out their practical impact on your business. For instance, penetration testing might show in detail how attackers could leverage outdated software for unauthorized access, guiding precise remediation actions as well.
- Review Security Controls in Place: Review the existing security controls, such as access control, encryption, and authentication. Determine whether these controls are sufficient to address the identified risks and note where they can be improved. This may reveal where security gaps currently exist, for example, missing multi-factor authorization on sensitive systems might lead to serious security risks. Eliminating these gaps will help to ensure a solid risk posture.
- Enhance Employee Awareness: This can be achieved through employee awareness and best practice training exercises on cybersecurity. Human error is a common point for most breaches, so staff needs to be trained on it for a robust risk posture. For instance, phishing simulations may determine who needs further training. Enhanced employee awareness significantly boosts an organization’s defenses against threats.
- Develop and Review a Risk Register: A risk register should be developed, including all identified risks, their likelihood, impact, and mitigation measures. The risks can then be analyzed to identify which should be allocated the most resources in terms of priority, those posing the greatest threat. For instance, server vulnerabilities might be prioritized for immediate action, while other less critical risks can be addressed later.
- Report and Plan for Improvement: Record the findings of the assessment and come up with an improvement plan for weaknesses. The report should have actions and assigned responsibilities. A clear improvement plan ensures that vulnerabilities are systematically addressed. For instance, upgrading cloud storage security may be recommended to be completed within a certain timeframe to mitigate identified risks and strengthen overall security.
Benefits of Assessing Security Risk Posture
Businesses can avail several advantages that come while conducting a security risk posture assessment. These assessments aid an organization in improving its cybersecurity capabilities and ensure its robustness in fighting various types of attacks. Some of the most significant advantages are listed below:
- Identify and Prioritize Vulnerabilities: This process helps the organization to identify loopholes in its systems. Since the most vulnerable areas are known, resource allocation can be shaped so that addressing the identified weaknesses has the least impact. This enables focused tests of high-impact vulnerabilities first to improve the security posture of an organization proactively and with much efficiency.
- Compliance Enhancement: An effective information security posture is always aligned with regulatory standards. Measuring a firm’s risk posture helps businesses cover gaps in compliance before the issues gain penalties. Thus, the assessment leads to the complete alignment of all policies along the industry requirements so that companies avoid non-compliance repercussions in terms of reputation and financial losses.
- Building Incident Response Capacity: Risk posture allows an organization to check its preparedness against security incidents. This shall give detailed insight into developing or refining the incident response plans that an organization may have to ensure that it is well placed in handling incidents once they do occur. This proactive planning minimizes the time it would take for an organization to get on its feet again and reduces the cost of recovery.
- Informed Security Investment: Businesses use risk posture levels as a guide in deciding where to invest in security. After knowing which component to improve, an organization would not waste its budget on inappropriate investments. As a result, businesses can identify high-risk areas and pay more attention to them in order to enhance the overall security environment without unnecessary expenditures.
- Reputation Safety: Reputation loss due to data breaches may seriously affect a company. A holistic security posture assessment helps organizations avoid incidents by identifying their weaknesses before they are exploited. These preventive measures keep customer trust intact and eliminate negative publicity that often accompanies security incidents.
Steps to Building a Robust Risk Posture
A strong risk posture is proactive and incorporates all technological, procedural, and human elements of an organization. Each step is made to minimize exposure to risk but maximize preparedness for the threats that might come in the future. Here is how to build a strong risk posture:
- Determine Your Risk Appetite: Risk posture is based on defining clearly the amount of risk an organization is willing to take. Risk appetite is an indicator of the degree of risk deemed acceptable by the organization. It guides a significant number of decisions while assuring alignment of the implemented risk management strategies with the business’s goals.
- Access Control and Authentication: Limit data and system access to employees and other third parties whose access may be required to perform a specific task or duty using multi-factor authentication and role-based access control. This limits the possibility of an insider attack on confidential information.
- Formulate a Detailed Risk Management Plan: Establish detailed plans for identifying, reducing, and managing risks by providing mitigation measures and contingency plans for unexpected circumstances. Risk management plans should also be dynamic or change constantly as new forms of risks are identified in the light of changing environments.
- Continuously Monitor and Assess Risks: Risk is not static because it constantly evolves. Organizations must utilize continuous monitoring tools to detect potential threats in real-time. Automated monitoring makes it possible to detect unusual activities and respond to possible incidents before being absolutely seized by them.
- Provide Standard Employee Training: Always keep your employees equipped with knowledge about their role in maintaining a robust risk posture. Engage workshops on topics about basic cybersecurity hygiene, such as phishing or the importance of good behaviors from the employees’ point of view.
- Test and Update Incident Response Plans: Test your incident response plans periodically using simulations. In doing this, you should ensure your organization is prepared in the event of an attack. Through regular testing, you identify any gaps and modify them, and your response plan stays up-to-date because it accommodates changes that come about as risks shift with time.
Common Challenges in Maintaining Risk Posture
Maintaining a risk posture is difficult when so many components and aspects are involved. Therefore, it becomes essential for an organization to first know which challenges they might face in the coming times. Understanding these ahead of the curve is important in terms of risks as well as continuously maintaining its information security strategies, as outlined below for your reference.
- Evolving Threat Landscape: In cybersecurity, the threat landscape constantly keeps changing, and more sophisticated threats keep on coming up. It means that maintaining a relevant risk posture in the face of continuous changes requires not only ongoing monitoring but also frequent updates to defenses. Rapid adaptation to these evolving risks is what will be needed to protect those assets for any organization.
- Scarce Resources: Most small and medium-scale businesses face challenges in obtaining appropriate risk postures as a result of limited financial or human resources. This usually reveals some form of weak coverage gaps, thin assessments, and weak response capabilities. Hence, prioritizing risk is of the essence. Efficient resource allocation in maximizing protection where it matters most becomes indispensable.
- Employee Awareness: Employees are usually the weakest link in cybersecurity. Without proper training in phishing, social engineering, and other more common types of attacks, proper risk posture is hard to maintain. Creating a culture of security awareness allows employees to be the first line of defense against cyber threats.
- Scarce Resources: Many SMEs have poor risk postures due to scarce financial or human resources. Coverage gaps thus lead to insufficient assessments and poor response capabilities, hence the need for prioritization of risk. A clear strategy will, therefore, be developed on how limited resources should be used in attempting to address high-priority risks and improve resilience.
- Lack of Employee Awareness: An employee is the weakest link in a cybersecurity strategy. Without training, especially in recognizing phishing attacks and social engineering attacks, the state of good risk posture is quite hard to maintain. That is where continuous training programs build on the capabilities of employees to identify and respond to potential threats that empower the frontline in organizational defense.
- Complexity of IT Environments: With the advancement of cloud computing, remote work, and connected devices, IT environments have become significantly more complex. The complexity of such environments makes it difficult to have a comprehensive view of the risk exposure of the organization and thus may leave blind spots in the risk posture evaluations.
- Compliance Requirements: Compliance standards vary significantly across different industries and must be met by the organization concerned. Staying up-to-date with these evolving standards while maintaining a proactive risk posture can be resource-intensive. In any case, failure to comply goes beyond simply increasing exposure to risk and leads to probable legal and financial repercussions.
Risk Posture Best Practices
Improving and maintaining a healthy risk posture requires the adoption of some best practices. These best practices reduce exposure to risk and, therefore, ensure that an organization’s risk management measures are effective. Some of the critical best practices include the following:
- Establish Clear Policies: Set clear policies on security that spell out the do’s and don’ts responsibilities, and procedures for managing risks in all departments. The clearer the guidelines, the more every team member well knows their role in the security to institute a consistent practice. Reviews of regular policy also keep the standards current with the existing threats.
- Conduct Periodic Risk Assessment: Organize periodic risk analyses to identify and manage new vulnerabilities. With such audits, an organization can keep up with the changes in threats it faces and take early control of the risk. This may be valid because cross-departmental input can give a fuller view of vulnerabilities.
- Use Threat Intelligence: Leverage threat intelligence to provide insight into the threats relevant to the industry, which could impact organizational operations. Integrating risk posture assessment prepares the organization to act before threats escalate and frequent updates from it keep them ahead of evolving tactics by threat actors.
- Outsource Third-Party Security Auditors: Outsource independent auditors who can analyze your risk posture correctly from an unbiased point of view. The reviews of independent parties will help in identifying the vulnerabilities ignored, which validates the findings made by your internal team. New areas for security improvements may come into view with external expertise.
- Deploy Security Automation: Apply automation to routine security activities such as vulnerability scanning and compliance checking. Automation minimizes the occurrence of human errors, which makes it effective in threat detection and response. Furthermore, this ensures that critical updates and assessments are always accurate.
Tools and Technologies to Enhance Risk Posture
There are different tools and technologies that help organizations manage and improve their risk posture. Each tool has particular management and risk-reduction abilities and helps businesses to stay ahead of threats at the right time. Here are some of the tools and technologies that can improve the risk posture of an organization:
- Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): SIEM solutions aggregate security data across the entire organization’s environment. They are then analyzed early to facilitate the detection of threats. Advanced analytics generating real-time alerts are provided for network visibility. Examples are Splunk and IBM QRadar, which give centralized visibility of data. By connecting the SentinelOne Singularity™ XDR with the mentioned SIEM platforms, organizations can integrate endpoint detection with data analysis for greater risk insight.
- Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR): EDR tools monitor endpoints constantly for suspicious activities thereby identifying threats before these can become major incidents. The SentinelOne Singularity™ XDR follows AI-based threat detection and promises to offer autonomous protection to the endpoints. There are various other tools that also offer rapid endpoint response capabilities. In short, installing an EDR tool would actually increase the risk posture through end-user devices and server protection.
- Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM): CSPM tools automatically identify and remediate cloud security problems to ensure compliance and risk reduction. Maintaining visibility into cloud security configurations requires having these tools in place. SentinelOne’s Singularity™ Cloud Security offers CSPM along with Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) to identify misconfigurations in the cloud. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is another tool used to scan for vulnerabilities in multi-cloud environments.
- Network Traffic Analysis Tools: Network traffic analysis tools monitor data flows in a network to help detect anomalies that might indicate an attack. These tools are extremely useful for identifying potential dangers by keeping constant watch over a network. For example, some tools, such as SentinelOne Singularity™ Endpoint, allow a security team to identify any anomaly easily on various endpoints. The Singularity™ platform integrates with other network monitoring solutions and is equipped with additional capabilities for full-spectrum monitoring in environments.
- Threat Intelligence Platforms: Threat intelligence platforms gather and analyze information regarding potential threats, preparing organizations in advance to prepare for attacks. It gives real-time insights so that security measures can be adjusted dynamically. Recorded Future provides intelligence, informing businesses about potential threats targeting their industry. Integrating this intelligence with the Singularity™ platform’s threat hunting tools allows security teams to take preventive measures and address risks proactively, enhancing their overall risk posture.
- Vulnerability Management Tools: These tools allow the vulnerability management process to become automated so that weaknesses may be easily pointed out. They give general reports that help in prioritizing. There are various solutions offered by SentinelOne that come with the capabilities for the assessment of vulnerabilities, among others. For example, Singularity™ Cloud’s agent-based or agentless tools give extensive protection such that every single security gap can be approached.
How SentinelOne Can Help?
SentinelOne enhances risk posture management via its AI-powered Singularity™ Platform. It provides proactive AI threat protection with real-time insights into vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. You can find hidden, known, and unknown security risks by scanning cloud estates. SentinelOne’s behavioral and static AI engines are excellent at scoping for the latest threats. It can detect emerging security issues and resolve them before they escalate.
Kubernetes Security Posture Management secures containerized services and applications, automates deployments, and orchestrates workloads into Kubernetes. SentinelOne’s agentless CNAPP provides a host of features for effective risk posture management, such as Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), IaC Scanning, Secret Scanning, Cloud Detection and response (CDR), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM), AI-SPM (AI Security Posture Management), External Attack Surface and Management (EASM), Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP), and more.
SentinelOne also guards identities from risk through identity governance, privileged access management, and continuous risk monitoring. It implements a Zero Trust Network Architecture (ZTNA) and multifactor authentication and ensures multi-cloud compliance with various regulatory standards, such as HIPAA, SOC 2, NIST, CIS Benchmark, and others.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we understood how a robust risk posture serves as the core enabler of efficient cybersecurity. An organization’s ultimate ability to identify and reduce risks is actually considered its resilience against possible threats. A proper risk stance provides businesses not just a foothold that enables them to protect against vulnerability but also aligns their strategic objectives in terms of security toward a holistic risk management strategy. Besides, this posture is further cemented by adherence to internal controls and the requirements for compliance. Businesses can, therefore, meet standards set forth in their respective industries while being able to manage their risk proactively. A sturdy risk posture is not an option but essential for each organization that yearns to be secure and agile in a world whose threat landscape grows increasingly ominous.
Ultimately, maintaining a strong risk posture is a continuous process that requires assessment, monitoring, and the use of advanced tools like those offered by SentinelOne. The SentinelOne Singularity™ platform offers comprehensive real-time threat detection and robust cloud protection capability, giving organizations the power to cognize and improve risk management practices while proactively tackling any security challenges. So, feel free to reach out, and let’s take a moment to talk about how we can help secure your business for the future.
FAQs
1. What does Risk Posture mean in a Business Operations Context?
Risk posture is an organization’s general level of risk exposure encompassing the probability of threats and their possible impact on its core operations, reputation, and financial health. Regular checks on risk posture ensure that the business enterprise has an effective approach to addressing such serious threats as the SolarWinds breach.
2. Why is understanding risk posture important to businesses today?
Understanding and managing an organization’s risk posture is fundamentally important in today’s complex cybersecurity. It is crucial to protect digital assets, remain competitive, and maintain continuity in the business. With a proper understanding of their posture, companies can implement very effective controls and eventually instill a security-first culture that reduces threats and residual risk.
3. What is the first step in improving or building a strong cyber risk posture?
The first step in improving or building a good cyber risk posture is identifying all assets and their risk-related issues. This is the very initial foundational step in documenting security controls that are in place to protect and reduce related risks and, hence, build a solid foundation for a proactive risk management strategy.